Friday, March 30, 2018

South Africa: A failure of Merit.

By Andrew Atkin:

South Africa is a tragedy. It went from a prosperous tyranny of apartheid, to an imploding tyranny of the incompetent. It achieved this in just a few short decades. South Africa is now on the brink of a White genocide, directly promoted by its new leadership.

South Africa provides an extreme example of what happens when a country of limited education and intellect embraces democracy, without respect to merit. And from here I must point out some uncomfortable truths to make my point.

The sub-Saharan average Black IQ is about 70. The average White IQ is about 100. Though I believe the IQ test to be an approximate measure of institutional intelligence, and not necessarily overall intelligence, the black-to-white IQ gap is nonetheless striking. It's too big to be brushed-off as a mere superficial or meaningless measure.

What should also be respected is that the sub-Saharan Black man has a brain that is notably smaller than both Whites and Asians (about 8% smaller) and that Blacks have a faster physical and mental maturity. This suggests that the IQ difference is probably biological, at least to some degree. Also indicative is that sub-Saharan Blacks show strong signs of being less intelligent in terms of cultural advancement. They do not seem to progress without direct external leadership, for even when the opportunities for development are presented to them.

All of this is true, yet we're not allowed to believe it (you racist!). Or, if the mainstream media can have its way, we're not even allowed to know it.

I can respect that these facts are hurtful if insensitively handled, which obviously is why this conversation is taboo. However, sometimes uncomfortable facts need to be appreciated to avoid even more painful potentials. And this is where South Africa--and intentional do-gooders--have failed and failed badly.

Without meaning to excuse the worst of apartheid, we have completely ignored the fact that sub-Saharan Blacks, as a group, are not as capable of running a modern western civilization as the White South African population. And we have likewise overturned what was a crudely meritocratic system, in exchange for a kind of blind idealistic faith in democracy. We put wishful-thinking ahead of realism and now, alas, the blood is on our hands.

Well thank you, South Africa. Your social experiment has made quite a statement. We can no longer argue that democracy does not need to be conditioned with controls for merit. If the general populous is grossly under or mis-educated, or of low intelligence, then you're asking for trouble.

So what is the solution for South Africa, today? How can South Africa go back to being the envy of the African continent for both Whites and Blacks alike? No, it should not be apartheid. Apartheid was a racist system, and of course people should be measured as individuals. However, South Africa still needs a political system rooted in MERIT if it is to ever prosper again.

My suggestion: Don't let anyone vote unless they have an IQ of at least 100. Don't let anyone take a position in high public office, if they do not have an IQ of at least 120.

IQ is a somewhat crude measuring rod, I know, but over averages (which is what counts) it is effective. It will work.

You would be foolish to think that a system like what I propose will not represent the interests of the less intelligent people, in material terms. Unintelligent people are notorious for voting for what looks good over what actually is good, because they simply don't link cause-to-effect with policy well. They think they're buying candy but too often end up with crap.

Also the idea of tempering democracy with meritocracy is not alien to us. We don't let young children vote because they're clueless, right? Of course. This principle needs to be expanded to adults of limited ability as well. And it should happen everywhere, world over. We would all be much better off for it, and better protected from the bleak potential of a thoughtless mob racing to the polls.

Tuesday, March 6, 2018

Ideal communications app for improving training and education

By Andrew Atkin

We all have smartphones now. So making a training video can be done on the spot, by nearly anyone.

But we have yet to exploit this technology because there doesn't seems to be an app yet available to properly facilitate smartphones for their training and communications potential.

I would like to make a structural suggestion for the development of an app that can greatly enhance workplace training, and communications and education in general.

The idea, is that you shoot a video from your phone using a master-app that takes care of all the associated fuss. A recorded video is later uploaded to a prescribed online server (internet or intranet) as soon as you hit 'send'. You can wait until you're at a WiFi point before uploading. There's no fuss.

However, because your video is meant for communications (not pretty visual effects) you can choose to greatly compress the video for efficiency, during the post-edit and before uploading.

This can be done with what I call 'spotlight compression' which should be integrated with the app.

-With your fingers on the touchscreen, you create and control (meaning control the position and size) of a low-compression (and therefore high-definition) bubble inside a later high-compression (and therefore low-definition) full-sized image. This is to ensure that the definition is only preserved which is specifically necessary for meaningful clarity. This can drastically reduce the file size of any training video. You can also choose to make the videos simple colours, or black and white, etc.

-Also desirable for communications videos, is a freeze-frame function. So, you press a point on the touchscreen and it holds to a single picture-frame, while still recording voice as a normal-running video. This of course gets rid of a lot of unnecessary data for a training video.

-Another thing educational videos should have is easy referencing for within each video. Basically, you apply an instant jump-to function...

In the post edit, you would want to apply chapters to each video. So, you make a list of integrated links, accessible just below the video, which click to the points within the video that are directly applicable to what you want to see. Obviously this is most important for longer videos, so people are not wasting much time searching.

-And finally, fast access tags (printable) for videos should be included. Using a simple number code, and also QR-codes for immediate video access from a cellphone. The QR-reader should be integrated with the app.


If it's all in one app, then it will be easy to use which is critical. The videos can be made without prior organisation, and quickly. That is key.

A company can set up a professional account with the app-based server, so all videos are uploaded to a secure point that can then only be downloaded by others with a pass. Again, it should all be streamlined into one app, including video recording, uploading and downloading, and file organisation, etc, because it can and should be dead easy to use. People should be using it as a communication medium all the time, especially in practical hands-on professions.

Another function to integrate with the app is a screen-cast recorder, that records everything on your computer screen. This is extremely useful for all kinds of training, and obviously computer training.

Imagine if everyone at work (or home) can access any training video on anything, for work or school, that is specifically correct for their learning and immediately accessible from their phones. It would prove to be a powerful tool for rapid on-the-job training, and help to resist the never-ending problem of communication breakdowns.

You can't beat monkey-see/monkey-do for fighting ambiguities and making everything instantly clear. Why 'describe' when you can just 'show'?

Can someone please hurry up and develop this app? I want it.

Thank you.


Note: Creating professional videos?

I can only speak from experience, but I believe that creating professional training videos (by using a slick outside source) is nearly always a bad idea. They look great, but are actually harder to receive and learn from as compared to a conscientiously composed in-house 'amateur' video. Not to mention that slick, professional-looking videos are extremely expensive to make.

I think it's the same dynamic when comparing talking naturally to reading from text. Reading from text is always harder for your audience to receive because it's not natural. In-house training videos, also, are more naturally expressed.