Were our politicians primed? - for mass vaccination

 

Let's start with the simple facts of the matter. The Pfizer vaccines were:

1. Hardly even short-term tested, let alone medium and long-term tested.

2. Radical in their function, creating unsettling questions on their potential longer-range health impact.

3. Given direct approval for public use due to Covid's emergency status, of which quickly proved to be a gross over-reaction (Covid was a non-pandemic by historic measure), resulting in basic checks on vaccine safety being erroneously removed.

4. Dishonestly promoted in a manner so to resist even rational vaccine hesitancy.

5. Mandated into the public. Thousands of New Zealanders received the vaccine, in spite of the fact that they never really wanted it, which is a serious human rights concern. 

That's all we need to know, to know that something strange happened to our politicians. The unanimous support for the mandates from our representatives was irrational - yet it happened. 

So how could this happen? I can only speculate and will.

My assumption is that our political parties were carefully primed from the very beginning. Authoritative voices would have had long conversations with our politicians before the vaccine show hit. The advisors would've said to them something akin to...

"You know, we have some incredible technology coming down the pike, using what's called mRNA. This technology can allow us to develop a vaccine in record time - not years, but months. Many medical professionals, including some quacks and anti-vaxxers, will oppose this technology if we try to use it. They will oppose it primary because they don't understand it. 

This is what worries me. It's not that their concerns will be entirely without argument, as it's true enough that no medication is 100% safe, but if they're given a platform they will scare millions out of taking the new vaccine. The result would be Covid body-bags reaching the height of the beehive. 

Interfering with free speech and moving in the direction of mandates is not something we are comfortable with, but this is a pandemic we're fighting so we need to ask if those body-bags are acceptable. I believe a war against vaccine hesitancy is a war for life."

Someone got into their heads. I think someone who talks like an impartial authority guided them over months, acting as a very believable "one source of truth".

Note, the observable propagandist will be propagandised themselves. It's hard to be believable if you don't believe what you're saying yourself. Nearly all of the Covid medical hierarchy would have been running on faith from above, just like our doctors were (er, that we were told to talk to...for "informed consent").

So that's my best bet. Our politicians were carefully primed by people who have themselves been carefully educated. The advisors had created parliamentary group-think on an impressive scale. Who else could have done it?

Ultimately, propaganda works by isolating alternative voices. Our politicians were taught to "know" that the critics were ignorants, even before they presented themselves. This is what priming does. It pre-conditions people's future responses. Our politicians laughed at the alternative voices even before they opened their mouths.

To conclude:

What was too obviously missing with the Covid show was authentic debate, otherwise holding the we-know-betters to account. If our politicians had made focused and sceptical investigations, the spell would've been broken. The mandates would then never have happened, or certainly not at the outrageous scale that we saw.

This is what makes the most obvious sense, to me. So, our political leaders, on a global scale, were played for fools by interests who have long learnt how to do it? I think so. Again, it's what makes sense to me. It's the only way this social and medical disaster could have happened.

And now the hole is dug. If the vaccines are proven to be more toxic than Covid itself (and it's looking that way) then our politicians and most of our medical establishment will be resistant to admitting it - or even knowing about it (people tend not to look for what they don't want to know). From here, they won't be second-guessing anything. The vaccines can then only be "all good".